<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which RSS reader?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/</link>
	<description>One day I&#039;ll get around to making this blog into a real web site!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I found Sharpreader to be a good, lightweight, reader for many years. There&#039;s nothing wrong with it, although the MSN messenger style popups used to annoy me a bit (RSS Bandit uses the standard system tray popups, which is better for me).

The clincher for me though is also what differentiated RSS Bandit from RSS Owl... The newspaper style view This is where RSS Bandit shows every single unread news item (in full, not just headlines) on one page. It used to take me a long time (and many mouse clicks) to read through every feed in Sharpreader, but with RSS Bandit I can do it very quickly, since I can scan down what is effectively just one long, well formatted, web page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found Sharpreader to be a good, lightweight, reader for many years. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with it, although the MSN messenger style popups used to annoy me a bit (RSS Bandit uses the standard system tray popups, which is better for me).</p>
<p>The clincher for me though is also what differentiated RSS Bandit from RSS Owl&#8230; The newspaper style view This is where RSS Bandit shows every single unread news item (in full, not just headlines) on one page. It used to take me a long time (and many mouse clicks) to read through every feed in Sharpreader, but with RSS Bandit I can do it very quickly, since I can scan down what is effectively just one long, well formatted, web page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>So in what ways is RSS Bandit better than SharpReader?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in what ways is RSS Bandit better than SharpReader?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>No probs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No probs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Ah, got it, it needed configuring with the proxy details, my bad :) Thanks David!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, got it, it needed configuring with the proxy details, my bad <img src='http://www.davidforster.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks David!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Most of the web is browsable normally, except for certain types of sites, i.e. pornographic, or personal hosting (geocities, etc). We have no control over the proxy, that&#039;s managed by IT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the web is browsable normally, except for certain types of sites, i.e. pornographic, or personal hosting (geocities, etc). We have no control over the proxy, that&#8217;s managed by IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Jay, perhaps your firewall/proxy at work requires authentication. There should be configuration options in the software for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, perhaps your firewall/proxy at work requires authentication. There should be configuration options in the software for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidforster.com/2005/12/01/which-rss-reader/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Weird, neither load any feeds for me at work. We have some web censorship software running here, but I don&#039;t see why it would block http requests to non-explicit content. Bummer.

I agree though, RSSOwl does look infinitely better than the alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird, neither load any feeds for me at work. We have some web censorship software running here, but I don&#8217;t see why it would block http requests to non-explicit content. Bummer.</p>
<p>I agree though, RSSOwl does look infinitely better than the alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
